As for papers, try this one is quite good. Also, this isn’t a paper, but here’s a good explanation of the Bayesian approach.

this game is more entertaining for the spectator:

“Uh. . . Shut up, you fundamentalist atheist! That’s why.”

Fuller is actually doing the same thing. Mussolini (or maybe his ghost writer) said, “If relativism signifies contempt for fixed categories and those who claim to be the bearers of objective immortal truth … then there is nothing more relativistic than Fascist attitudes and activity… From the fact that all ideologies are of equal value, that all ideologies are mere fictions, the modern relativist infers that everybody has the right to create for hmself his own ideology and to attempt to enforce it with all the energy of which he is capable.” Umberto Eco recognized this self-serving solipsism as a defining characteristic of fascism and noted that such radical syncretism is intrinsic to fascist thought. In such a system, critical thought (which recognizes the resulting contradictions) is rejected as liberal and modern. Defending reason and critical thought is not fascism. Attacking reason and critical thought in favor of syncretism is, on the other hand, much closer to the f-bomb.