Scientists have no trouble uttering the names Darwin and Hitler in the same breath. Ask PZ Myers or Richard Dawkins to read the following sentence aloud:

We cannot legitimately blame Darwin’s science for Hitler’s madness.

I doubt they’d choke on their own tongues. Or, consider this passage from page 260 of Carl Sagan’s The Demon-Haunted World.

Yes, the Darwinian insight can be turned upside down and grotesquely misused: Voracious robber barons may explain their cutthroat practices by an appeal to Social Darwinism; Nazis and other racists may call on “survival of the fittest” to justify genocide. But Darwin did not make John D. Rockefeller or Adolf Hitler. Greed, the Industrial Revolution, the free enterprise system, and corruption of government by the monied are adequate to explain nineteenth-century capitalism. Ethnocentrism, xenophobia, social hierarchies, the long history of anti-Semitism in Germany, the Versailles Treaty, German child-rearing practices, inflation, and the Depression seem adequate to explain Hitler’s rise to power. Very likely these or similar events would have transpired with or without Darwin.

Gee, I didn’t have very much trouble copying that down or reading it aloud just now.

I mention this because it seems symptomatic of Dembski’s intellectual laziness and rhetorical sleaze factor.