<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: It Begins&#8230;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://canofpowerup.wordpress.com/2008/04/09/it-begins/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://canofpowerup.wordpress.com/2008/04/09/it-begins/</link>
	<description>Observations</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 17:38:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Nullifidian</title>
		<link>http://canofpowerup.wordpress.com/2008/04/09/it-begins/#comment-372</link>
		<dc:creator>Nullifidian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Apr 2008 04:53:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://canofpowerup.wordpress.com/?p=137#comment-372</guid>
		<description>William Dembski is a goddamn dumbass. That was really breathtaking stupidity, even from him. Copying the video and tweaking it slightly doesn&#039;t make copyright infringement go away, since the copyright holders can still prove that the animation is substantially derived from their work.

I doubt Dembski would sit still for someone who basically paraphrased one of his works with acknowledgment, so why does he think the producers of Expelled can get away with it, and worse why does he think they&#039;re being clever when they try to do so?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>William Dembski is a goddamn dumbass. That was really breathtaking stupidity, even from him. Copying the video and tweaking it slightly doesn&#8217;t make copyright infringement go away, since the copyright holders can still prove that the animation is substantially derived from their work.</p>
<p>I doubt Dembski would sit still for someone who basically paraphrased one of his works with acknowledgment, so why does he think the producers of Expelled can get away with it, and worse why does he think they&#8217;re being clever when they try to do so?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Expelled for plagiarism &#171; Further thoughts</title>
		<link>http://canofpowerup.wordpress.com/2008/04/09/it-begins/#comment-367</link>
		<dc:creator>Expelled for plagiarism &#171; Further thoughts</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2008 05:43:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://canofpowerup.wordpress.com/?p=137#comment-367</guid>
		<description>[...] Powerup: It Begins&#8230; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Powerup: It Begins&#8230; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: William Wallace</title>
		<link>http://canofpowerup.wordpress.com/2008/04/09/it-begins/#comment-366</link>
		<dc:creator>William Wallace</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2008 05:36:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://canofpowerup.wordpress.com/?p=137#comment-366</guid>
		<description>Oh well.  Anyway, you&#039;ve been listed as a promoter of the film.

http://ianramjohn.wordpress.com/2008/04/10/expelled-for-plagiarism/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh well.  Anyway, you&#8217;ve been listed as a promoter of the film.</p>
<p><a href="http://ianramjohn.wordpress.com/2008/04/10/expelled-for-plagiarism/" rel="nofollow">http://ianramjohn.wordpress.com/2008/04/10/expelled-for-plagiarism/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tyler DiPietro</title>
		<link>http://canofpowerup.wordpress.com/2008/04/09/it-begins/#comment-364</link>
		<dc:creator>Tyler DiPietro</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2008 03:59:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://canofpowerup.wordpress.com/?p=137#comment-364</guid>
		<description>I have it automated to send pings and trackbacks to those whose posts I link to. If you don&#039;t want it there, you can always delete it.

&lt;i&gt;&quot;I do have a question: why did you use the phrase “legions of closet creationists in academia”?&quot;&lt;/i&gt;

Because that&#039;s the whole premise of the film you&#039;re defending. That there are a bunch of closet creationists cowering in fear of an all-pervasive Darwinian orthodoxy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have it automated to send pings and trackbacks to those whose posts I link to. If you don&#8217;t want it there, you can always delete it.</p>
<p><i>&#8220;I do have a question: why did you use the phrase “legions of closet creationists in academia”?&#8221;</i></p>
<p>Because that&#8217;s the whole premise of the film you&#8217;re defending. That there are a bunch of closet creationists cowering in fear of an all-pervasive Darwinian orthodoxy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: William Wallace</title>
		<link>http://canofpowerup.wordpress.com/2008/04/09/it-begins/#comment-363</link>
		<dc:creator>William Wallace</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2008 03:54:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://canofpowerup.wordpress.com/?p=137#comment-363</guid>
		<description>Yes, I honored your trackback, which is probably more than any in the PT-mafia will do for my trackbackss.  

I do have a question:  why did you use the phrase &quot;legions of closet creationists in academia&quot;? 

Meanwhile, why don&#039;t you leave a comment on my blog before the trackback request?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, I honored your trackback, which is probably more than any in the PT-mafia will do for my trackbackss.  </p>
<p>I do have a question:  why did you use the phrase &#8220;legions of closet creationists in academia&#8221;? </p>
<p>Meanwhile, why don&#8217;t you leave a comment on my blog before the trackback request?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
