Comments on: Electrostatic Crackpottery http://canofpowerup.wordpress.com/2008/04/04/electrostatic-crackpottery/ The Spiritual Successor to Growthrate n lg n Wed, 20 Aug 2008 05:13:53 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=MU By: Tyler DiPietro http://canofpowerup.wordpress.com/2008/04/04/electrostatic-crackpottery/#comment-350 Tyler DiPietro Sun, 06 Apr 2008 02:35:16 +0000 http://canofpowerup.wordpress.com/?p=130#comment-350 "The Spinal Tap Theory of Eledctromagnetism"? “The Spinal Tap Theory of Eledctromagnetism”?

]]> By: skullsinthestars http://canofpowerup.wordpress.com/2008/04/04/electrostatic-crackpottery/#comment-349 skullsinthestars Sun, 06 Apr 2008 00:53:49 +0000 http://canofpowerup.wordpress.com/?p=130#comment-349 Nicely put. I especially liked the part where the author states: "If ones (1) were placed in the places of m1, m2, and d of Newton’s law, the resultant force of gravity would be relatively insignificant. However, if ones (1) were placed in the places of q1, q2, and d of Coulomb’s Law, the resultant force would be incredible. It would roughly translate to about a million tons." This is in fact the same sort of logic as saying, "This one goes to 11!" :P Nicely put. I especially liked the part where the author states: “If ones (1) were placed in the places of m1, m2, and d of Newton’s law, the resultant force of gravity would be relatively insignificant. However, if ones (1) were placed in the places of q1, q2, and d of Coulomb’s Law, the resultant force would be incredible. It would roughly translate to about a million tons.”

This is in fact the same sort of logic as saying, “This one goes to 11!” :P

]]>